|
 |
15,000 scientists dispute theory of global
warming. |
Support Light Up The World Foundation (LUTW)
|
|
EMF Researcher Faked Data
|
Quotes From "Environmentalists" |
Environmentalists?
Human beings, as a species, have no more value
than slugs.
—John Davis, editor of Earth First! Journal
First Global
Cooling In The 70’s…
“This
cooling has already killed hundreds of
thousands of people. If it continues and no
strong action is taken, it will cause world
famine, world chaos and world war, and this
could all come about before the year 2000.”
—Lowell Ponte in “The Cooling”,
1976
“In ten years all important
animal life in the sea will be extinct. Large
areas of coastline will have to be evacuated
because of the stench of dead fish.”
—Paul Ehrlich, Earth Day
1970
“The continued rapid cooling
of the earth since WWII is in accord with the
increase in global air pollution associated with
industrialization, mechanization, urbanization
and exploding population.”
—Reid Bryson, “Global Ecology; Readings towards
a rational strategy for Man”,
1971
Newsweek
April 28,
1975
The Cooling
World
There are ominous signs that the Earth’s weather
patterns have begun to change dramatically and
that these changes may portend a drastic decline
in food production– with serious political
implications for just about every nation on
Earth. The drop in food output could begin quite
soon, perhaps only 10 years from now...
...Climatologists are pessimistic that political
leaders will take any positive action to
compensate for the climatic change, or even to
allay its effects. They concede that some of the
more spectacular solutions proposed, such as
melting the Arctic ice cap by covering it with
black soot or diverting arctic rivers, might
create problems far greater than those they
solve...
Then
Global Warming In The 80’s?
“What we’ve got to do in energy
conservation is try to ride the global warming
issue. Even if the theory of global warming is
wrong, to have approached global warming as if
it is real means energy conservation, so we will
be doing the right thing anyway in terms of
economic policy and environmental policy.”
—Timothy Wirth, former U.S. Senator (D-Colorado)
“We
have wished, we eco-freaks, for a disaster or
for a social change to come and bomb us into
Stone Age, where we might live like Indians in
our valley, with our localism, our appropriate
technology, our gardens, our homemade
religion—guilt-free at last!”
—Stewart Brand (writing in the Whole Earth
Catalogue).
“Human
beings, as a species, have no more value than
slugs.”
—John Davis, editor of Earth First! Journal
So
What’s the Next “Cause” To Scam 1/3 Of Your
Paycheck?
Yes, California is the home of more eco-nazis
than any other state. They're perception:
unless you think as they do, you are evil and
only seek to destroy the environment.
Because I support the loggers, I hate the
forests? I spend more time in the forest
than 80% of Sierra Club members...because I hate
the forests? Is it that difficult to
comprehend that we build using wood, and that
wood is our only renewable resource? Don't
most people use toilet paper? Yes, there
can be a balance between enjoying and using our
forests...and it shouldn't be just so that the
Sierra Club lawyers can get rich, which they do!
If
you’re a Californian, you nearly always vote to
have more of your paycheck given to the
government, and you will never ask where
it is actually going or how it is being spent,
really expecting nothing in return for your
money, except to ease your guilt for making
money in the first place. All long as it
is for the children, the schools, or the
environment. One political party runs
California, the perfect one, of course. So
why isn’t California perfect?
Why do they need to put the same bond issues on
the ballot every year to get money to fix the
same problems that the voters have been
approving for the last 10 years? There is
no political opposition to the one party that
"owns" the state...they can create whatever
legislation they want...it’s just easier to
blame, for their failed plans and policies, the
next "higher up", the federal government
leadership...which happens to be the opposing
party.
At the city level: - San Francisco, my home
town, is "owned" exclusively by one political party and
caters almost exclusively to special interests,
they can do whatever policy they want, whether
constitutionally legal or not, with no
opposition from the "other" party. Within
an hour in this beautiful city, while walking downtown, you can see a
"homeless person" defecate on the sidewalk
downtown. That bum has more "rights" than
the owners of the property he just defecated on.
A criminal can shoot to death a police
officer and the "activist district attorney"
will promise not to seek the death penalty.
If only every city in this country
could be made to be this perfect too - wouldn't
it be a great country? This one particular
political party will tell you they know best.
You get what you vote for (well, except here in
California - a judge with an special
interest-agenda will strike down any
voter-approved measures that they don't like,
regardless of the majority-vote, or the fact
that it was legal to put the bill onto the
ballot in the first place).
But no matter how
determined this one party is to destroy this
beautiful and productive state and make it a
liberal utopia, the sane logic of those
living/working outside the major cities does
sometimes prevail.
Have a great day!
|
