HOME  | BOOKMARK  |


.

 

  environment   

15,000 scientists dispute theory of global warming.  |  Support Light Up The World Foundation (LUTW)  |

EMF Researcher Faked Data  |  Quotes From "Environmentalists"  |

 Environmentalists?

Human beings, as a species, have no more value than slugs.
                                                  —John Davis, editor of Earth First! Journal


First Global Cooling In The 70’s…

 “This cooling has already killed hundreds of thousands of people. If it continues and no strong action is taken, it will cause world famine, world chaos and world war, and this could all come about before the year 2000.” —Lowell Ponte in “The Cooling”, 1976

 “In ten years all important animal life in the sea will be extinct. Large areas of coastline will have to be evacuated because of the stench of dead fish.” —Paul Ehrlich, Earth Day 1970

 “The continued rapid cooling of the earth since WWII is in accord with the increase in global air pollution associated with industrialization, mechanization, urbanization and exploding population.” —Reid Bryson, “Global Ecology; Readings towards a rational strategy for Man”, 1971

Newsweek
April 28,
1975

The Cooling World
There are ominous signs that the Earth’s weather patterns have begun to change dramatically and that these changes may portend a drastic decline in food production– with serious political implications for just about every nation on Earth. The drop in food output could begin quite soon, perhaps only 10 years from now...
...Climatologists are pessimistic that political leaders will take any positive action to compensate for the climatic change, or even to allay its effects. They concede that some of the more spectacular solutions proposed, such as melting the Arctic ice cap by covering it with black soot or diverting arctic rivers, might create problems far greater than those they solve...


 Then Global Warming In The 80’s?

 “What we’ve got to do in energy conservation is try to ride the global warming issue. Even if the theory of global warming is wrong, to have approached global warming as if it is real means energy conservation, so we will be doing the right thing anyway in terms of economic policy and environmental policy.” —Timothy Wirth, former U.S. Senator (D-Colorado)

 “We have wished, we eco-freaks, for a disaster or for a social change to come and bomb us into Stone Age, where we might live like Indians in our valley, with our localism, our appropriate technology, our gardens, our homemade religion—guilt-free at last!” —Stewart Brand (writing in the Whole Earth Catalogue).

 “Human beings, as a species, have no more value than slugs.” —John Davis, editor of Earth First! Journal


 So What’s the Next “Cause” To Scam 1/3 Of Your Paycheck?

Yes, California is the home of more eco-nazis than any other state.  They're perception: unless you think as they do, you are evil and only seek to destroy the environment.  Because I support the loggers, I hate the forests?  I spend more time in the forest than 80% of Sierra Club members...because I hate the forests?  Is it that difficult to comprehend that we build using wood, and that wood is our only renewable resource?  Don't most people use toilet paper?  Yes, there can be a balance between enjoying and using our forests...and it shouldn't be just so that the Sierra Club lawyers can get rich, which they do!

 

If you’re a Californian, you nearly always vote to have more of your paycheck given to the government, and you will never ask where it is actually going or how it is being spent, really expecting nothing in return for your money, except to ease your guilt for making money in the first place.  All long as it is for the children, the schools, or the environment.  One political party runs California, the perfect one, of course.  So why isn’t California perfect? 

 

Why do they need to put the same bond issues on the ballot every year to get money to fix the same problems that the voters have been approving for the last 10 years?  There is no political opposition to the one party that "owns" the state...they can create whatever legislation they want...it’s just easier to blame, for their failed plans and policies, the next "higher up", the federal government leadership...which happens to be the opposing party.

 

At the city level: - San Francisco, my home town, is "owned" exclusively by one political party and caters almost exclusively to special interests, they can do whatever policy they want, whether constitutionally legal or not, with no opposition from the "other" party.  Within an hour in this beautiful city, while walking downtown, you can see a "homeless person" defecate on the sidewalk downtown.  That bum has more "rights" than the owners of the property he just defecated on.  A criminal can shoot to death a police officer and the "activist district attorney" will promise not to seek the death penalty.  If only every city in this country could be made to be this perfect too - wouldn't it be a great country?  This one particular political party will tell you they know best.

 

You get what you vote for (well, except here in California - a judge with an special interest-agenda will strike down any voter-approved measures that they don't like, regardless of the majority-vote, or the fact that it was legal to put the bill onto the ballot in the first place).

 

But no matter how determined this one party is to destroy this beautiful and productive state and make it a liberal utopia, the sane logic of those living/working outside the major cities does sometimes prevail.

Have a great day!
 

 
TOP | HOME  |

                          © Copyright 2007. www.mike-devlin.com.  All rights reserved.